Thursday, May 12, 2011

The value of paper qualifications

What's up with Blogger???? This post was up on Thursday 12 May and suddenly, I find it's back in my draft box, unposted. GAAAHHH. To all those who left comments, sorry, I think they've inexplicable disappeared.

Over the past two weeks, I've been trawling the internet for GE news, like thousands of other Singaporeans. One of the blogs I like to visit is Mr Wang Says So. Apart from the fact that he writes insightful political pieces, he's also a terrific writer. By terrific, I mean his writing style is simple but engaging. If I'm not wrong, he's a lawyer working in the financial industry but what captured my attention is that he's also an award-winning poet and a published author.

About a year ago, I was startled to discover that he's the brother of my friend and ex-business partner. My friend is a supremely talented artist so it looks like the creative streak runs in the family. Singapore is a tiny place.

Ok, commercial over. The reason I brought this up was that in the midst of reading Mr Wang's blog, I stumbled across this post on the value of paper qualifications. I love it because it proves what many people like me have suspected for many years - paper qualifications are really not worth that much. The humour is that Mr Wang had to literally lose them to confirm the point.

As he says, when you're young, "the most important purpose of a certificate is to help you get another certificate (for example, the PSLE cert helps you to get the O-level cert which helps you to get the A-level)." After that, certificates are most often needed for employment.

At some point, even this ceases to matter because what's important is how we perform on a job, not a piece of paper. Curiously, that's where I find that people sometimes err - by equating their own value with their certification. When I was still under employment, I sometimes came across individuals who would spout things like, "I have an MBA from ChicagoU." Which would be ok if it wasn't said in a tone that implied I should be impressed by that fact alone.

A paper qualification is a paper qualification. The important thing is what you have learned in the process of acquiring it and how you are applying the knowledge. The fact that you possess it is often irrelevant. Worse, some people actually believe that having that extra certificate means they automatically make better decisions. Trust me, you can have a Harvard degree and still make mistakes that cause organisations to bleed money. (I'm pretty sure the bankers and financial experts involved in the US sub-prime mortgage crisis didn't buy their qualifications from the black market).

I wrote this post because I feel many Singaporeans have become obsessed with grades and paper qualifications. From the time our kids are 12, we push them to conquer every paper hurdle, starting with the PSLE. While these certificates may be important, they shouldn't be life-centric, meaning your kids spend every waking hour performing tasks that help them achieve the next piece of paper. I hear of so many sec 1 kids who, meeting new classmates for the first time, don't ask "what's your name?" but "what's your t-score?"

It is a mindset that continues into adulthood and is easy to spot - the adults who still bring up their 'O' level performance, academic awards or how they scored an 'A' in a subject, in their conversations with you. These are the folks stuck in the paper mode. Their self-worth is embodied in these achievements so they have to constantly remind others of them, even if these events happened some 30 years ago. It's a little sad to see.

Paper qualifications are merely the tools to help us achieve our goals. Realising that these qualifications don't define us also helps us to be less judgmental towards those without. Let's have some perspective.

9 comments:

  1. *LOL* "what's your t-score?" I guess I'll be seeing that in good time... from the same parents/kids who are asking me now "Is your daughter at Learning Lab yet?" . I suspect most don't even know my daughter's name...

    What you wrote is so true, Mon. In my career days, I had the chance to interview many people who on paper looked like they wouldn't stack up against others but we ended up hiring them because they had many other qualities - work smarts, real work experience, great attitude & EQ. Contrast that with many well-qualified candidates/ employees who often came with hang-ups and were unhappy because they felt they deserved more - from pay to promotions - simply because "they had (paid a lot to get) an MBA"...

    People do need to be reminded to put paper qualifications into perspective. Albert Einstein put it brilliantly: "Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school." ... it certainly isn't all about collecting certs!

    ReplyDelete
  2. whenever my nieces and nephewsDARE question my authority: Eh, i passed my PSLE one hor! 4 As, ok?!

    and you can see that they'd be suitably cowed!!!

    *die laughing*

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ada: Yes, I find all those parents who constantly ask about scores and TLL participation terribly annoying. I much prefer the parents who ask me whether my kids are happy in school.

    I think a system that categorises people by their grades and qualifications breeds very entitled folks. Hence you have some of those who've garnered all the "right" paper thinking the world owes them a living, whereas those you mentioned, with work experience and great EQ, may actually perform better because they demonstrate their capabilities without expecting you to assume they exist.

    I'm tired of hearing MOE spout their drivel about needing to compete with China and India, as if setting ridiculously tough exams and streaming out the elite kids is the only way to combat this issue. I really hope that one day, they will wake up and see that education is about educating and not about the paper.

    ReplyDelete
  4. KJJ: You classic lah! One day they will wake up and think, err... in this day and age, 4 As not that big a deal leh. Hehe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I still wish they didn't make known the grades & scores like in my time when we did PSLE. Then we'd all be blissfully ignorant of our "t-score".

    ReplyDelete
  6. mon, i know it's no big deal. i had interns who had better paper qualifications!!! but what i'm saying is that the paper qualifications worked well as a weapon of mass obedience for kids aged between 6 - 11. beyond that, i don't care. it's just a piece of paper!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Karmeleon: Eh, you didn't know your t-score? I thot you did PSLE around the same time I did. Back in my time, the t-score was over a total of 400.

    KJJ: Haha, really ah, it works with kids? Don't think it would work with mine, they'll just say, "I don't care! I'm not you!" lol

    ReplyDelete
  8. In the 1970s don't hv leh. My cert only shows pass... no grades. So you just "tikam" to apply for sec schools. Most students stayed with their affiliated sec school, so it didn't quite matter. Only those students who didn't have affiliated sec school might try to apply for other sec school. if you don't get your 1st choice (eg. RGS), then you get 2nd choice and so forth lor.

    ReplyDelete
  9. OIC. Mine was in early 1980s, maybe they changed it by then. But the tikam of schools applied to us too! It was like a guessing game cos we had to apply for schools before we knew our results, so silly. Those who played it safe probably could have gone to better schools and those who over-estimated their exam skills ended up in worse schools. But that randomness meant there was less elite grouping, that was the plus side!

    ReplyDelete

I welcome comments, both positive and negative, as long as they're not inflammatory or hostile. This is a personal blog, not a forum, so I have the right not to publish any anonymous comments. I think it is basic courtesy to at least leave a name. All ads (even those disguised as comments) will be unceremoniously deleted and marked as spam. My blog, my rules. With that, thanks for reading!